ray95 0 Posted October 12, 2011 Report Share Posted October 12, 2011 Ever since installing DB v1.2.0.0, deleting files on my WHS takes a very long time. I?ve installed v1.2.0.1 but nothing has changed. Deleting a TV show that is in the Recorded TV folder takes over 30 seconds. Any idea what?s going on? Thanks, Ray Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tscales 0 Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 The only time I've seen this symptom, I had a failing drive. Look in the log -- if I drive is taking a long time (i.e. failing), DB tells you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ray95 0 Posted October 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 Thanks for the reply. What log should I look in and how exactly does DB tell you? My System logs look fine for today. Nothing looks like it points to anything wrong. Should I look at the DB.xxx.sil logs? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pvg00 0 Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 I've noticed a definite speed issue renaming files in a pool. I've also checked the logs and not seen anything strange. I have two brand new 2tb Seagate Green drives (AHCI in BIOS) in a pool assigned to drive letter F:. I've moved the shared Server Folders into the pool and have turned on duplication for all folders *except* Videos. Regardless of how I access my Videos folder though (local, network, remote), when I try to rename a video file it takes about 5 seconds to save the new name, almost every time. The speed accessing these files appears to be fine - I'm streaming to my Ipad through AirVideo without any difficulties. Any ideas on what to try to speed up this more basic functionality? In fact, any ideas how to speed up all file functionality because I can't say as I'm happy with the file transfer speeds I'm seeing either (my mobo supports 6Gb SATA, as do these drives, and I have 8Gb of RAM and nothing else running on the server during these tests): 25-30MB/second copying a 2.9Gb 45-50MB/second copying 700Mb These drives (I've seen screenshots and read many a review) are capable of much faster speeds (like double). I'd seen a post from Anthony stating he was happy with the speed as everyone else seemed to be - so maybe these results are typical or I've configured something wrong. Hopefulyl someone reading this might have an idea or 2 as I'd be much happier knowing it's something I've done incorrectly. Peter Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.